Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Thunder v. City of Green Bay
as 1:2026cv01717
Plaintiff:
James David Thunder
Defendant:
City of Green Bay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bintz et al v. Luell et al
as 1:2026cv01233
Plaintiff:
David Bintz and Robert Bintz
Defendant:
Richard A Luell, Robert Haglund and City of Green Bay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wery v. Genrich et al
as 1:2026cv00898
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allan Wery
Defendant:
Eric Genrich and City of Green Bay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Green Bay v. REV Group Inc et al
as 2:2026cv00819
Plaintiff:
City of Green Bay
Defendant:
Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp, American Industrial Partners Capital Fund IV LP, Oshkosh Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: Fire Apparatus Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2026md03179
Unknown:
Fire Apparatus Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
City of La Crosse, City of Augusta, The Newstead Fire Co Inc and others
Defendant:
Oshkosh Corporation, Pierce Manufacturing Inc, REV Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ray Stevenson v. John Luetcher, et al
as 26-1013
Plaintiff:
RAY L. STEVENSON
Defendant:
JOHN LUETCHER, JOHN RICHARD FISKE, SCOTT ASPLUNG and others
Ray Stevenson v. John Luetcher, et al
as 25-3034
Plaintiff:
RAY L. STEVENSON
Defendant:
JOHN LUETCHER, JOHN RICHARD FISKE, SCOTT ASPLUNG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
