Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Cherokee Properties, LLC v. Oroville et al
as 2:2026cv03581
Plaintiff:
Cherokee Properties, LLC
Defendant:
City of Oroville, David Pitman, Natalie Sheard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BAM Properties, LLC v. City of Oroville, et al.
as 26-6448
Plaintiff:
BAM PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF OROVILLE, PATRICK PIATT, Community Development Director and RICHARD STANFORD
(PC) Tatum v. City of Oroville et al
as 2:2026cv01814
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Tatum
Defendant:
City of Oroville, Oroville Police Department and Adam Huey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Tatum v. City of Oroville et al
as 1:2026cv03668
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Tatum
Defendant:
City of Oroville, Oroville Police Department and Adam Huey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherokee Properties, LLC v. City of Oroville et al
as 2:2026cv00371
Plaintiff:
Cherokee Properties, LLC
Defendant:
City of Oroville, David W. Pitman, Natalie Sheard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
BAM Properties LLC v. City of Oroville et al
as 2:2026cv00041
Plaintiff:
BAM Properties LLC
Defendant:
City of Oroville, Richard Stanford and Patrick Piatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
James v. City of Oroville et al
as 2:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Dana Marie James
Defendant:
City of Oroville, Robert Sasek and Ali Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at00952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Albanese v. City of Oroville
as 2:2022cv01131
Plaintiff:
Samuel Albanese
Defendant:
City of Oroville and John Sanzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
