Cases 41 - 50 of 70
PARKER v. CITY OF PENSACOLA
as 3:2014cv00525
Plaintiff:
EVELYN PARKER
Defendant:
CITY OF PENSACOLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BONDS v. GERACI et al
as 3:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
ABBI J BONDS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GERACI and CITY OF PENSACOLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WEATHERSPOON v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2013cv00360
Plaintiff:
AMOS WEATHERSPOON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, PENSACOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF PENSACOLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CITY OF PENSACOLA v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PENSACOLA
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC, BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, BP PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
CAMPBELL v CITY OF PENSACOLA et al
as 3:2013cv00161
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CITY OF PENSACOLA and LISA BROXTON CUTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ADAMS v. CITY OF PENSACOLA FLORIDA et al
as 3:2012cv00580
Plaintiff:
BILL ADAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PENSACOLA FLORIDA , CHIP SIMMONS and R EAGERTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Occupy Pensacola, et al v. City of Pensacola, Florida
as 12-15832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OCCUPY PENSACOLA, SARA J. BEARD, MICHAEL B. KIMBERL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
NETTLES v. WELLS
as 3:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
MARVIN LEE NETTLES
Defendant:
WELLS, PENSACOLA POLICE DEPT, CITY OF PENSACOLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NETTLES v. PENSACOLA POLICE DEPT, et al
as 3:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
MARVIN LEE NETTLES
Defendant:
PENSACOLA POLICE DEPT, CITY OF PENSACOLA, BAUERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
