Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Davis v. Klepel et al
as 2:2026cv01673
Plaintiff:
Tiffany B Davis
Defendant:
Craig J Klepel and City of Racine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
April Mitchell, et al v. Randall Smith, et al
as 26-2541
Plaintiff:
APRIL MITCHELL and K. M., by and through her mother, April Mitchell
Defendant:
RANDALL SMITH, PO, JOSEPH STEVEN, Sgt, GABRIEL GARCIA, PO and others
Gipson v. City of Racine Wisconsin et al
as 2:2026cv01269
Plaintiff:
Virgil LaMar Gipson
Defendant:
City of Racine Wisconsin, John Does and Mr Callus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fagan v. City of Racine et al
as 2:2026cv00798
Plaintiff:
Patrick Fagan
Defendant:
City of Racine, Redevelopment Authority of the City of Racine, Rodney Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
The Estate of Dontae Shannon v. City of Racine et al
as 2:2024cv01575
Defendant:
City of Racine, Chad Stillman and Peter Boeck
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Dontae Shannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01324
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 ADA - Discrimination
BREG Pike River Development Inc et al v. City of Racine et al
as 2:2024cv00909
Defendant:
Mayor Cory Mason, City of Racine and Village of Mount Pleasant
Plaintiff:
BREG Pike River Development Inc and BREG Pike River LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
