Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
McKoy v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Ronald McKoy
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Raleigh Police Department and Tanner C. Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Williams v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Sonya Felecia Williams
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Estella Patterson, Christopher D Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Edwards v. City of Raleigh
as 5:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Leo J. Edwards
Defendant:
City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Keister v. Wake County District Attorney Office et al
as 5:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Francis Keister
Defendant:
Wake County District Attorney Office, Lorrin Freeman, City of Raleigh and others
Ward v. City of Raleigh
as 5:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Delbert Quillen Ward
Defendant:
City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Blackmon v. Holder et al
as 5:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
James Blackmon
Defendant:
James Holder, Andrew Munday and City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeRose et al v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Lanette B DeRose and Richard T DeRose
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, DoorDash, Inc., Beaver Creek Land Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Fullard v. City of Raleigh
as 2:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
CHANDRA FULLARD
Defendant:
City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
