Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TAYLOR v. CITY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEONARD TAYLOR, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA, FRANCISCO O. CONTRERAS, OSARIO DAVID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYTER v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 5:2019cv00664
Defendant:
JOHN M. SOLECKI, FRANK PAWLOSKI, DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LYTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALHOUN v. CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2016cv02448
Plaintiff:
TIA RENEE CALHOUN
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, DANIEL WHITE, POLICE OFFICER JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NIEVES v. CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2013cv07611
Plaintiff:
RICARDO NIEVES
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA , VAUGHN SPENCER , WILLIAM HEIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2013cv04824
Plaintiff:
JOAN LYNNE LANE
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA , GEORGE TAVERAS and OFFICER JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ v. CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2011cv01768
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO NUNEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA , CITY OF READING POLICE DEPARTMENT , WILLIAM HEIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
