Cases 1 - 10 of 60
(PS) Williams et al v. Sierra County et al
as 2:2026cv02596
Plaintiff:
Crystyl Williams and Xavier Arcilla
Defendant:
Sierra County, City of Sparks, Sparks Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roberto Uranga v. Christopher J. Hicks et al
as 3:2026cv00507
Plaintiff:
Roberto Uranga
Defendant:
Christopher J. Hicks, Washoe County, State of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Digesti et al
as 3:2025cv00332
Plaintiff:
Tavish L. Johnson
Defendant:
Heather Digesti, Harvey, City of Reno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fitzgerald v. Reno Crime Suppression Unit, et al.
as 25-3653
Plaintiff:
MARTY FITZGERALD
Defendant:
RENO CRIME SUPPRESSION UNIT, COUNTY OF WASHOE and CITY OF SPARKS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
McNeely v. Loeschner, et al.
as 24-3601
Plaintiff:
DAVID MCNEELY
Defendant:
PETER LOESCHNER, CHRIS CRAWFORTH, KEVIN L. DACH and others
Fitzgerald v. Reno Crime Suppression Unit et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Marty Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Reno Crime Suppression Unit, Washoe County, NV and City of Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Fye, et al.
as 24-146
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL HOWARD
Defendant / Appellant:
KEN FYE
Defendant / Appellee:
T. BAILEY, SPARKS POLICE DEPARTMENT, terminated per #3 Order, WASHOE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, terminated per #3 Order and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
