Cases 41 - 50 of 159
CRAWFORD v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al
as 4:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
DENISE CRAWFORD
Defendant:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE , LEIGH ANNE FRECHETTE and ROBERT E MCGARRAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolle v. Perry et al
as 5:2018cv00046
Plaintiff:
Randall Rolle
Defendant:
Charles Perry, Sam Bruce, Randy Frazey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolle v. City of Tallahassee et al
as 5:2018cv00045
Defendant:
David Collins, Judge Thomas Bateman, City of Tallahassee and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolle v. City of Tallahassee et al
as 5:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
City of Tallahassee, Owen McCaul, James Hankinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolle v. Shelfer et al
as 5:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
James Shelfer, Emilly Glenn, Sherri West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolle v. Robinson et al
as 5:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
Roderick Robinson, Demetris Taylor, Stacey Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolle v. West et al
as 5:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
Sherri West, Emilly Glenn, Michael Macnamara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
SMITH v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al
as 4:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
CLINTON O SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE and ROBERT E MCGARRAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Rolle v. City of Tallahassee Florida, et al
as 17-12689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE FLORIDA, ENTITY, LILJA M. DANDELAKE, ATTORNEY, JOHN MACELUCH, ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY and others
WARNER v. VARBLE et al
as 4:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
ERELSON WARNER
Defendant:
LAURA VARBLE and CITY OF TALLAHASSEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
