Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Walker v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2026cv00705
Defendant:
Ryan Thompson, James Kidd, Zachary Moring and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wells v. VerMeer et al
as 4:2026cv00695
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Ryan VerMeer
Plaintiff:
Mark Allan Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clemons v. Keck, et al
as 26-5150
Defendant:
CODY LAWRENCE, Tulsa Police Office #2932, MONROE NICHOLS, Mayor of City of Tulsa and SPENCER E. KECK, Tulsa Police Officer #2930
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. CLEMONS, AKA Lloyd Christopher Clemons
Simon v. City of Tulsa, Tulsa County et al
as 4:2026cv00693
Defendant:
S Titus, SC Perry, PD Whitehead and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Nathaniel Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Parrett v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2026cv00678
Plaintiff:
Tyler Parrett
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Andre Baul, Skyler Hargrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellard v. Duff et al
as 4:2026cv00613
Plaintiff:
Joshua Caleb Ellard
Defendant:
Shea Jojane Duff, John/Jane Doe and City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zane v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2026cv00582
Plaintiff:
Tucker Zane
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Officer 1, John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2026cv00573
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Monroe Nichols, Mike Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Goff v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 26-5117
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY GOFF
Defendant:
THE CITY OF TULSA, TIMOTHY MARLER, SERGEANT BROWN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
