Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 22-2121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., SAP AMERICA, INC. and others
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 4:2021cv07922
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young and Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2021cv07361
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young and Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, Lawrence E Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arunachalam v. Gordon et al
as 1:2020cv01020
Defendant:
Edward L. Tulin, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Facebook, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ou-Young v. Obama et al
as 3:2015mc80185
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, II, Richard G. Kopf, D. Lowell Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ou-Young v. Obama et al
as 3:2015mc80180
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, II, Richard G. Kopf, D. Lowell Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ou-Young v. Roberts, Jr., et al
as 5:2014mc80174
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Claudia Wilken, Ronald M. Whyte and others
Ou-Young v. Roberts et al
as 4:2014mc80028
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Claudia Wilken, Edward M. Chen and others
Ou-Young v. Roberts et al
as 3:2014mc80018
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Claudia Wilken, Edward M. Chen and others
Ou-Young v. Roberts et al
as 5:2014mc80017
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Claudia Wilken, Edward M. Chen and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
