Cases 41 - 50 of 218
Smith v. Gaphardt
as 1:2014fp00430
Defendant:
Clark Gaphardt
Plaintiff:
Randy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Colon, et al
as 14-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODOLFO CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM COLON, MARLON MEDERO, KEVIN FOUNTAINE and others
Defendant:
BONNIE WERNER, HAROLD W. CLARKE, LUIS SPENCER and others
Stote, et al v. Umass Correctional Health Care, et al
as 14-1827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. STOTE
:
JAMES CYR and JOSE SIME
Plaintiff:
WAYNE D. CROSBY, TERRY CARTER, ENEZ KOLENVOVIC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UMASS MEDICAL SCHOOL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Clark v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12734
Plaintiff:
Ronald Clark
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloman v. Deakin et al
as 1:2014cv12594
Plaintiff:
Tajuan Holloman
Defendant:
David Deakin, Harold Clarke, James Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. US
as 14-1638
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW G. CLARK
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Widi v. McNeil, et al
as 14-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL MCNEIL, TD BANKNORTH, N. A. and EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF, United States Attorneys
Defendant:
STEPHEN E. HICKEY, JR., CHRISTOPHER J. DURKIN, DALE L. ARMSTRONG and others
Rasheed v. D'Antonio, et al
as 14-1220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RASHAD AKEEM RASHEED
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA D'ANTONIO, MARLENE DODGE, DYANA NICKL and others
Clark v. Spencer
as 1:2013cv12989
Plaintiff:
Richard Clark
Defendant:
Luis Spencer, Cornelia Deleon and Allison Hallett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Undzis et al
as 1:2013cv12751
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Clark
Defendant:
John I. Undzis, Luis S. Spencer, Allison Hallett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
