Cases 1 - 10 of 274
Alfredo Martinez-Perez v. Gina Clark, et al
as 24-1672
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO MARTINEZ-PEREZ
Defendant:
GINA CLARK, Superintendent - SCI Chester, M QUINN, Grievance Coordinator - SCI Chester and DR. PAUL G. LITTLE, Doctor - SCI Chester
Damile Mitchell v. Earl Jones, et al
as 24-1308
Plaintiff:
DAMILE Q. MITCHELL
Defendant:
EARL J. JONES, Deputy Superintendent for Facility, BRIAN FLINCHBAUGH, Deputy Superintendent for Centralized Services, CAMPBELL, Captain at SCI-Albion and others
Lockett v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lockett
Defendant:
Sgt. Clark, Lt. Ngduea, Sgt. Slayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickens v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Rashan Mickens
Defendant:
Sharon Clark, Heather Haldeman, A.J. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patricella v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Bruce Patricella
Defendant:
John Doe, Sgt. Smith and Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Perez v. Clark et al
as 2:2023cv03972
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Martinez-Perez
Defendant:
GINA CLARK, M QUINN and Dr. Paul Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Andy Ortiz
Respondent:
BM. Zborovancik, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Perez v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Martinez-Perez
Defendant:
Gina Clark, M. Quinn and Dr. Paul Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and MICHAEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Andy Ortiz
Defendant:
BM. Zborovancik, John Doe, Dan Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
