Cases 1 - 10 of 488
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Eric Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Hill County Jail
as 4:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eric James Clark
Defendant:
Hill County Jail, Sandy Lynn Cook, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Exeter Finance LLC
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Audrey Clark
Defendant:
EXETER FINANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Clark v. The Charles Schwab Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
The Charles Schwab Corporation, The Colorado Division of Securities, The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Collier et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Ivery Clark Williams
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Michael Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carter v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv02578
Plaintiff:
Alvin Stephon Demiro Carter
Defendant:
State of Texas and Phillip Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dickerson v. TDCJ director C & D et al
as 3:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
Terry Dickerson
Defendant:
TDCJ director C & D, Brandon Birmingham, Sarah Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Euless Police
as 4:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Shackles Duane Clark
Defendant:
Euless Police, Trarrant County Jail Medical Staff, Trarrant County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
