Cases 1 - 10 of 140
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Melissa Long
Defendant:
Clark County, NaphCare, Inc., KENNETH CHENG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. Clark County et al
as 3:2024cv05202
Plaintiff:
Melissa Long
Defendant:
Clark County, Pamela Frisby, Dollie Drape and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ritenburgh v. Clark County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv05185
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ritenburgh
Defendant:
Clark County Jail, Clark County Sheriff's Office, Clark County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Clark County et al
as 3:2024cv05123
Plaintiff:
Stacy Bowen
Defendant:
Clark County, Grant Hagen, Austin Cloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Brown et al
as 3:2024cv05021
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles S Brown, Charles Scott Brown Trust, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Raymond Moss
Defendant:
Clark County Title Co., Chase Bank NA, Housing Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Moss v. Clark County Title et al
as 3:2023cv05317
Plaintiff:
Raymond Moss
Defendant:
Clark County Title, Chase Bank NA, Gary Sautter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Tran v. Clark County Court
as 3:2023cv05278
Plaintiff:
Tam Tran
Defendant:
Clark County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tran v. Clark County Court
as 3:2023cv05218
Plaintiff:
Tam Tran
Defendant:
Clark County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
