Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Clay (PS) v. Colloi
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
Carleous Darrell Clay
Respondent:
Colloi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clay v. L. Lores, et al
as 1:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Carleous Clay
Defendant:
Central Office, L. Lores, Mrs. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Elroy Clay
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Lares et al
as 1:2022cv02657
Plaintiff:
Carleous Darrell Clay
Defendant:
L. Lares and Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fate v. City of Lakewood et al
as 1:2022cv02627
Plaintiff:
Brian Kemp Fate
Defendant:
City of Lakewood, Lakewood Police Department, Timmy Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2021cv03234
Plaintiff:
Carleous Clay and Carleous D. Clay
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Antoine V Walker, Zamora Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
2505 6th Street, LLC v. WestGuard Insurance Company et al
as 1:2021cv01673
Plaintiff:
2505 6th Street, LLC doing business as Baymont by Wyndam Limon
Defendant:
AmGuard Insurance Company and WestGuard Insurance Company
Intervenor:
Ashley Clay and Logan Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Denver Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2021cv00844
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Denver Sheriff Department and Diggins
Plaintiff:
Clay M. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heaslet v. Daley et al
as 1:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Michael Clay Heaslet
Defendant:
Rardin and Daley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Little et al
as 1:2021cv00087
Defendant:
Dian Fergerson, Crawford, Ponce and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
