Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Konecny v. The Big M Casino, et al
as 24-1090
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
THE BIG M CASINO, GEORGE FREELAND, DANA GOODELL and others
Konecny (PS) v. Big M Casino, The et al
as 1:2023cv03250
Plaintiff:
J. Alan Konecny
Defendant:
Big M Casino, The, George Freeland, Dana Goodell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 - IDEA: Challenge Decision re: Education for Handicapped
Clervrain v. Merrill et al
as 5:2021cv00675
Defendant:
John Merrill, Paul D Pate, Brian Bingman and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. City of Aurora, Colorado et al
as 1:2019cv02539
Plaintiff:
Andre Williams
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Colorado, Edward Clements, Matthew Milligan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Denver Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv01587
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gomez
Defendant:
Denver Police Dept., Mathew Clements and Antonio Milo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington et al v. Saint Francis Community Services et al
as 6:2017cv01282
Plaintiff:
Bruce Clement Pennington, Jr. and Vanessa Kay Oller
Defendant:
Saint Francis Community Services, Cassie Allen, Mary Busch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Durborow, et al
as 17-5023
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TAUNYA PERRY
Defendant - Appellant:
TERRY DURBOROW, in his Individual Capacity
Defendant:
DANIEL CLEMENTS and JEREMY FLOYD
Havens v. CDOC, et al
as 16-1436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL HAVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF COLORADO, RICK RAEMISCH and others
Perez v. Clements et al
as 1:2016cv00693
Plaintiff:
Marshall Perez
Defendant:
Matthew Clements and City and County of Denver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
