Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wood et al v. SGT Investment et al
as 3:2025cv00667
Plaintiff:
Andrea Wood and T.P.
Defendant:
SGT Investment, Clement Holdings, Tom Malgesini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood et al v. Sgt Investment et al
as 3:2025cv00271
Plaintiff:
Andrea Wood
Defendant:
Sgt Investment, Clement Holdings, Tom Malgesini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. Ho, et al.
as 25-2480
Plaintiff:
ANDREA WOOD
Defendant:
RODNEY HO, CLEMENT HOLDINGS, KEVIN EIKENBERRY and others
Wood v. Ho et al
as 3:2024cv00512
Defendant:
Kevin Eikenberry, SGT Investment, Clement Holdings and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. Eikenberry, et al.
as 24-4321
Plaintiff:
ANDREA CLAIRE WOOD
Defendant:
KEVIN EIKENBERRY, SGT INVESTMENTS and CLEMENT HOLDINGS
Clement Holdings, LLC v. Reece
as 4:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Clement Holdings, LLC
Cross-Defendant:
Clement Holdings, LLC and Wyoming Investments, LLC
Cross-Complainant:
Winford Reece
Defendant:
Winford Reece
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wood v. Eikenberry
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Andrea Wood
Defendant:
Kevin Eikenberry, Clement Holdings and SGT Investments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrea Wood, et al v. Sgt Investment, et al
as 23-15939
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREA CLAIRE WOOD and TAYLOR PACKWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT INVESTMENT, CLEMENT HOLDINGS, TOM MALGESINI and others
Wood v. Clement Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv04785
Plaintiff:
Andrea C. Wood
Defendant:
Clement Holdings, LLC, FCI Lender Services, Inc., SGT Investments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Steven Wierzba v. Quality Loan Service, Co., et al
as 17-15325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN WIERZBA
Defendant - Appellee:
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE, CORPORATION, J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., JILL N. JAFFE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
