Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Beasley v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Clifton E. Beasley
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Clifton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Mary Clifton
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dungee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03013
Plaintiff:
Clifton Dungee
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clifton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02885
Plaintiff:
Stacey Clifton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wardle et al v. Clifton Healthcare Center et al
as 1:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Randal Wardle and Marvin L. Newman
Defendant:
Clifton Healthcare Center, Hughley Hospital and the Seventh-Day Adventist Church and Jewish Hospital & Peace Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Onunwor v. Black
as 1:2023cv00810
Petitioner:
Clifton C. Onunwor
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logan Clifton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Barbara Logan Clifton
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clifton v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02202
Plaintiff:
Martin Clifton
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dance et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
Clifton Dance and Chieko Imada Dance
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Panezich v. Foley
as 4:2021cv00331
Respondent:
Warden Keith J. Foley
Petitioner:
Clifton Panezich and Clifton J. Panezich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
