Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Cayuga Nation v. Parker
as 26-2932
Plaintiff:
CAYUGA NATION, by and through its lawful governing body, the Cayuga Nation Council
Defendant:
DUSTIN PARKER, NORA WEBER, JOSE VERDUGO, JR. and others
Cayuga Nation v. Parker
as 26-2807
Plaintiff:
CAYUGA NATION, by and through its lawful governing body, the Cayuga Nation Council
Defendant:
PAUL MEYER, DUSTIN PARKER, NORA WEBER and others
Parker v. Halftown et al
as 5:2024cv00886
Respondent:
Joseph E. Fahey, Donald Jimerson, Timothy Twoguns and others
Petitioner:
Dustin Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cayuga Nation et al v. The County of Cayuga, New York et al
as 6:2024cv06420
Plaintiff:
Cayuga Nation and Clint Halftown
Defendant:
Mark Balistreri, The County of Cayuga, New York and The County of Seneca, New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cayuga Nation v. Tanner
as 20-1310
Plaintiff:
Gary Wheeler, John Does 1-20, Richard Lynch and others
Counter Claimant:
Board of Trustees of the Village of Union Springs, New York, Howard Tanner, Village of Union Springs Code Enforcement Officer, in his official capacity, Village of Union Springs, New York and others
Defendant:
Edward Trufant, Village of Union Springs Mayor, in his official capacity
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Lujan, et al
as 1:1990cv00957
Plaintiff:
Ramah Navajo Chapter
Defendant:
Manuel Lujan , Eddie Brown , Marvin Pierce and others
Amicu:
Chugachmiut and Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc.
Movant:
Klamath Tribes, Confederated Tribes of SiletzIndians of Oregon , Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and others
Claimant:
Confederated Tribes of SiletzIndians of Oregon and Navajo Agricultural Products Industry
Objector:
United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Class Counsel
Interpleader:
Alturas Indian Rancheria, Phillip Del Rosa , Darren Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
