Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Dannez Hunter v. Keith Rupert Murdoch, et al
as 19-2293
Defendant / Appellee:
David S. Doty, Ruben Castillo, James Rupert Murdoch and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dannez W. Hunter
Hunter v. Murdoch et al
as 0:2019cv00590
Defendant:
William J. Clinton Foundation, The, Paul Watcher AT&T Inc., City of Saint Paul and others
Plaintiff:
Dannez Hunter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Craig v. Getty Images (U.S.), Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv09916
Plaintiff:
Glen Craig
Defendant:
Getty Images (U.S.), Inc., CNN America Inc., NBCUniversal Media, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
CNN America, Inc. v. NLRB
as 15-1209
Petitioner:
CNN America, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
NLRB v. CNN America, Inc.
as 15-1112
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
CNN America, Inc.
Movant-Intervenor:
National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians - Communications Workers of America, Local Union No. 31
CNN America, Inc. v. NLRB
as 14-1180
Petitioner:
CNN America, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Movant-Intervenor For Appellee:
National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians - Communications Workers of America, Local Union No. 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
