Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00396
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Coffman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00747
Plaintiff: Linda Coffman
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Coffman et al
as 1:2017cv00196
Plaintiff: Mary M. Johnson and Robert B. Johnson
Defendant: Scott A. Coffman and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Shumate et al
as 2:2017cv00095
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant: David Shumate, Jr., Wilma L. Shiflett and Tracey M. Coffman-Vincent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Plaintiff: Mae E. Coffman
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11824
Plaintiff: Mary D. Coffman
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07731
Plaintiff: Tosha Coffman
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02276
Plaintiff: Virginia Coffman and Richard Coffman
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffman v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00597
Plaintiff: Edward James Coffman
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coffman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv07135
Plaintiff: Amy Coffman and Scott Coffman
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?