Cases 1 - 10 of 239
Watkins v. South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force, Village of Burnham, City of Oak Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Brown v. Village of South Holland, et al
as 1:2024cv02170
Plaintiff:
Christian Brown
Defendant:
Village of South Holland, and Detective Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Coleman et al
as 1:2024cv01112
Defendant:
Traver Coleman, Harold Gist and City of Virden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Gist et al
as 3:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Traver Coleman
Defendant:
Harold Gist and City of Virden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wayde Coleman v. Josh Peters, et al
as 23-3353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYDE COLEMAN and WAYDE M. COLEMAN, II
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSH A. PETERS, CINDY PALMER, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, Marion County and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Douglas v. Sauk Village, Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv14559
Plaintiff:
Sonya Douglas
Defendant:
Sauk Village, Illinois, Arnold Coleman, Aretha Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
