Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nina Ringgold, et al v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 17-16269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, in her Individual and Official Capacity as former Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Tony Hill v. Commission on Judicial Perform, et al
as 16-56659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY LEE HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE, Judge's Supervisiors State of California, official capacity, JUDGE JAMES R. BRANDLIN, official capacity, JUDGE STEVEN VON SICKLEN, official capacity and others
Nina Ringgold, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 13-71484
:
In re: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Petitioner:
NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Nina Ringgold, et al v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 13-15366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Nina Ringgold, et al v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 12-16828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Nina Ringgold, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 12-72500
:
In re: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Petitioner:
NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Ringgold et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2012cv00717
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Kamala Harris, Commission on Judicial Performance of the State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Nina Ringgold , Justin Ringgold-Lockhart and Law Offices of Nina Ringgold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jon Lance Clements v. The State of California et al
as 5:2009cv01531
Plaintiff:
Jon Lance Clements
Defendant:
The State of California, The Judicial Council of California, The Commission on Judicial Performance of the State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
