Cases 11 - 20 of 22,679
Amerson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Joel Lynn Amerson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Robles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00376
Plaintiff:
Angelica Maria Robles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(SS) Robles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Angelica Maria Robles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Allen v. O'Malley
as 24-2927
Plaintiff:
SUSAN E. ALLEN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Lowe v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv08089
Plaintiff:
Zenida Connor Lowe
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walker v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Skyler Robert Walker
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Houghtelling v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05348
Plaintiff:
Taryn M. Houghtelling
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Boggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05342
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Boggs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dodge v. O'Malley
as 24-2899
Plaintiff:
ERICA LYNNE DODGE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Mcclune v. O'Malley
as 24-2911
Plaintiff:
MARTHA MCCLUNE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
