Cases 31 - 40 of 1,933
CARLISLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01402
Plaintiff:
HARRY J. CARLISLE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HUGHES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
RONDA LYNN HUGHES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
EVANS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY et al
as 2:2024cv01360
Plaintiff:
CARL EVANS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Tricia S. Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McClane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lee McClane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
TURHANAJ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
ALBANO TURHANAJ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Goodermuth v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Frances Goodermuth
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HUNNICUTT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
AMY LEIGH HUNNICUTT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CRAMER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01273
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CRAMER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CORTESE, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. CORTESE, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and US SSA USAO NOTICE ONLY PARTY TO ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE AGREEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
