Cases 41 - 50 of 589
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Roomster Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv07389
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, People of The State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Roomster Corp., John Shriber, Roman Zaks and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts)
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party:
Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court:
ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16095
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16094
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. the Arizona Game and Fish Commission and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16096
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Kifor v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2022cv11141
Plaintiff:
Imre Kifor
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Middlesex Probate and Family Court, Mass Dor Child Support Enforcement Division and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al v. EPA
as 22-1084
Petitioner:
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, Domestic Energy Producers Alliance, Energy Marketers of America and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Clean Fuels Development Coalition, et al v. EPA
as 22-1085
Petitioner:
Clean Fuels Development Coalition, ICM, Inc., Illinois Corn Growers Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS v. Joseph Freedman Co., Inc.
as 3:2022cv30047
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Defendant:
Joseph Freedman Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
