Cases 81 - 90 of 90
Tom Mustric v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv01429
Defendant:
Robert S Carter, Fujio Cho, Robert C Daly and others
Movant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management Board
Plaintiff:
Tom Mustric
IN RE TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 2:2010cv00922
Defendant:
Robert S Carter, Fujio Cho, Robert C Daly and others
Movant:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management Board, William P. Condon and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Stackhouse
United States of America, State of California, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Florida, State of Hawii, State of Illinois, State of Louisiana, Commonwealth of massachusetts, State of et al v. Eli Lilly & Company
as 3:2009cv03651
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of California, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Florida, State of Hawii, State of Illinois, State of Louisiana, Commonwealth of massachusetts, State of and State of Tennessee, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Georgia, State of Indiana, State of Michigan, State of Montana, State of New Hampshire, State of New Mexico, State of New York, S
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
People of the State of California et al v. Kempthorne et al
as 3:2008cv05775
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Edmund Brown, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne, Dirk Kempthorne, Dirk Kempthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Hamilton v. Sanofi-Avenits
as 3:2008cv01986
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hamilton , State of Michigan , United States of America and others
Defendant:
Sanofi-Avenits
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
George Pappas v. Countrywide Financial Corp et al
as 2:2007cv05295
Defendant:
Martin R. Melone, Edwin Heller, Countrywide Home Loans Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Dr Marshall J Orloff Ira RO FCC as Custodian AllianceBernstein US Focs Blnd, Patrick J Simpson and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Grant Thornton LLP, KPMG LLP, Countrywide Securities Corporation and others
Not Classified By Court:
Byron B Matthews, Jr, SRM Global Limited Fund Partnership, Independent Fiduciary Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado, Shelley B. Katzeff, Barry Brahn and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Thomas P DiNapoli and Marsha Steele
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Robert L Garber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The State of California et al v. Winbond Electronics Co.
as 3:2007cv02589
Plaintiff:
The State of California, The State of Alaska, The State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Winbond Electronics Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America et al v. J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
as 5:2006cv00055
Plaintiff:
The Commonwealth of Virgina, State of Tennessee, State of Delaware and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
City of Vallejo, Valley Center Municipal Water District, City of Santa Rosa and others
Intervenor:
City of Pomona, City of San Jose, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and others
Not Yet Classified:
City of Auburn
Defendant:
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc., Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A. and Seal A
Petitioner:
Brian Wang
Intervenor Defendant:
Walter Wang
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
