Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Muhammad Bryant v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2024cv03265
Plaintiff:
Al-Akhir Islam Muhammad Bryant
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burgess v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Earl Dushawn Burgess
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03096
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks, State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Florida Cancer Specialist, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates and others
Interested Party:
21st Century Oncology of Jacksonville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc.
as 23-28
Plaintiff:
State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks, District of Columbia ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks
Defendant / Appellee:
Florida Cancer Specialists, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates, Integrated Community Oncology Network, LLC and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Montgomery Cancer Center, Oncology Specialties, P.C. and others
Soule v. Connecticut Association of Sch
as 21-1365
Defendant / Appellee:
Danbury Public Schools Board of Education, Glastonbury Public Schools Board of Education, Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chelsea Mitchell, a minor, by Christina Mitchell, her mother, Alanna Smith, a minor, by Cheryl Radachowsky, her mother, Ashley Nicoletti, a minor, by Jennifer Nicoletti, her mother and others
Petitioner:
Business Executives
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Pediatrics, Hezekiah Beardsley Connecticut Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, New York State American Academy of Pediatrics and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC
as 22-728
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Federal Trade Commission, State of New York, State of California and others
Defendant:
Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Phoenixus AG and Kevin Mulleady, individually, as an owner and director of Phoenixus AG and as a former executive of Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
Martin Shkreli, individually, as an owner and former director of Phoenixus AG and as a former executive of Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC
United States of America, ex r v. Amgen Inc.
as 22-18
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Ex Rel. Joseph Piacentile and Kevin B. Kilcoyne, State of California, State of Delaware and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joseph Piacentile and Kevin Kilcoyne
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Oncology, Inc.
Defendant:
Amgen, Inc., Amerisource Bergen Corp., Amerisource Bergen Specialty Group, Inc. and others
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00706
Defendant:
Martin Shkreli, Kevin Mulleady, Phoenixus AG and others
Plaintiff:
State of New York, Federal Trade Commission, State of California and others
Petitioner:
Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, ASD Healthcare and others
Not Classified By Court:
Medisca, Inc., Infectious Diseases Society of America, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Cerovene, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53 b
Greene v. Orange
as 21-2591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Donald Greene
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph Eric Orange, Sheriff, County of Roanoke, Commonwealth of Virginia, Bobby Russell, Superintendent, Western Virginia Region, Steven A. McGraw, Clerk of Court, Roanoke Couinty Circuit Court, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
