Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01164
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03974
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
DAVIS v. COMMUNITY HOWARD REGIONAL HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv03803
Defendant:
COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK, INC. and COMMUNITY HOWARD REGIONAL HEALTH, INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. DAVIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00150
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03465
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
JULIO-JOHNSON v. COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC., et al
as 1:2016cv03359
Defendant:
COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC. and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
TISA JULIO-JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
EMSWILLER v. COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03095
Defendant:
COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK, INC. and UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JASON EMSWILLER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02678
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
