Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Valdez v. Roehm et al.
as 4:2023cv05102
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Valdez
Defendant:
Brittnie E Roehm, Eric Eisinger, Brad Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00983
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01817
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01262
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2018cv01115
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, United States Department of State, Sarah Heidema and others
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety, Electronic Frontier Foundation and The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
Interested Party:
Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Taylor v. Conn's Inc et al
as 3:2016cv05408
Defendant:
Conn's Inc and Does 1 through 20
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv00763
Defendant:
Conn's Inc and Does 1 through 20
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conn v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv05086
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Plaintiff:
Travis Lee Conn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
