Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Connie Marshall v. Sean Delahanty, et al
as 15-6297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
SEAN DELAHANTY, MIKE O'CONNELL, MARY JUDE WOLFORD and others
Marshall v. Delehanty et al
as 3:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
Connie Marshall
Defendant:
Sean Delehanty , Mike O'Connell , Mary Jude Wolford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connie Marshall v. Mike O'Connell, et al
as 14-6372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE O'CONNELL, County Attorney Commonwealth of KY, LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF STEVE CONRAD, Police Chief and others
Marshall v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Connie Marshall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marshall v. O'Connell et al
as 3:2013cv00802
Plaintiff:
Connie Marshall
Defendant:
Mike O'Connell , Louisville Metro Police Department , Steve Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connie Marshall v. Elizabeth Fries, et al
as 12-5076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH FRIES and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY
Connie Marshall v. National College, et al
as 12-5061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL COLLEGE, NATIONAL COLLEGE, CEO, VICKI STRUNK and others
Connie Marshall v. National College, et al
as 11-5190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL COLLEGE, NATIONAL COLLEGE, CEO, VICKI STRUNK and others
Connie Marshall v. Elizabeth Fries, et al
as 11-5191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH FRIES and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY
Marshall v. National College et al
as 3:2010cv00776
Plaintiff:
Connie Marshall
Defendant:
National College, National College, CEO, Vicki Strunk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
