Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Kaddex, LLC v. DMCA 17 U.S.C. 512(h) SUBPOENA TO THE CONSTANT COMPANY, LLC.
as 3:2023mc80063
In Re:
DMCA 17 U.S.C. 512(h) Subpoena to the Constant Company, LLC. doing business as Vultr
Petitioner:
Kaddex, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(PS) McGuire et al v. Roseville Joint Union High School District et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Desiree McGuire and Cadence DeVault
Defendant:
Roseville Joint Union High School District, John Becker, Andrew Tagg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
James Constant v. Schorr Law
as 2:2021cv08608
Plaintiff:
James Constant
Defendant:
Schorr Law
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GA Telesis, LLC et al v. Salesforce.Com, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv02701
Defendant:
Does 1-10, inclusive and Salesforce.Com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Constant Aviation, LLC and GA Telesis, LLC
United States of America v. Constant Care Home Health Agency, Inc.
as 2:2020cv11632
Defendant:
Constant Care Home Health Agency, Inc. and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
James Constant v. Southern California Edison Co.
as 2:2020cv06700
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Co.
Plaintiff:
James Constant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mendoza v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2019cv01713
Defendant:
Stu Sherman, A. Shaw, David Constante and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Eighteen Karat Club et al
as 2:2019mc00087
Defendant:
R. L. Frick, James G. Donavan, Shreve & Company and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
