Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Cook, Jr. v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Elmore Cook, Jr.
Defendant:
Shaundra Williams, Jonathan King, Daniel Cheatwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00654
Petitioner:
Tiffany Cook
Respondent:
Warden K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carmichael v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Roderick Carmichael
Defendant:
Brown, Sgt, CO1 Hughes, CO2 Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Parker et al (INMATE 2)
as 4:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
O. Parker, D. Dent, C. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Holcomb et al
as 2:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Elmore Cook, Jr
Defendant:
Holcomb, Coats, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
R Brown, W Cook, R Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray, Jr. v. Public Defenders Office Shelby County et al
as 2:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jerry Carter Gray, Jr.
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office Shelby County, District Attorney's Office Shelby County, John Samneigo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pope v. Cook et al
as 2:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
Michael Pope, Jr.
Defendant:
Warren Cook, Reginald Rambo and Carl Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Fountain Facility et al
as 2:2021cv00254
Defendant:
Fountain Facility, Mary Cooks and Anthony Smiley
Plaintiff:
Michael Kardell Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Lancaster et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00108
Defendant:
Officer Brown, Officer Hughes, Officer Cookie and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Eugene Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
