Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER, COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, GLEN FALLS HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv02811
Plaintiff:
SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL, COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as COOPER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, POMONA VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
INTEGRIS SOUTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
INTEGRIS SOUTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER and COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as COOPER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01097
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., WELLINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, MCALLEN HOSPITALS, LP and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ALTA LOS ANGELES HOSPITALS, INC. et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv00934
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL, ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Joan Mattson, et al v. Aetna Life Insurance Co, et al
as 15-3255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOAN MATTSON and ERIC MATTSON, individually and as a class representative on behalf of other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO, DBA Aetna Inc, RAWLINGS CO, DBA Rawlings Group, SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY REGIONAL EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND and others
COOPER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL v. LEAVITT
as 1:2008cv03781
Plaintiff:
COOPER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
