Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03113
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00174
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mershah v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 2:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
Naenb Mershah
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Christopher Apodacca and Corey Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01247
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv02435
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carralero v. Miller et al
as 1:2020cv01150
Respondent:
Corey Price, Chad Wolf, US Attorney's Office and others
Petitioner:
Dennis Ariel Adan Carralero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miliam Borjas-Borjas v. William Barr, et al
as 20-16957
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, COREY PRICE, in his official capacity as Interim Phoenix Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner / Appellant:
MILIAM MARGARITA BORJAS-BORJAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00417
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
