Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Pride v. Danberg et al
as 1:2008cv00848
Plaintiff:
Ashley A. Pride
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Patrick Ryan, Douglas Repetti and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Woods v. First Correctional Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00397
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Woods
Defendant:
First Correctional Medical Inc., Correctional Medical Services Inc., Director of Medical at DCC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Andrus v. Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00251
Plaintiff:
Daryl Andrus
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc., Lawrence McDonald, Frederick VanDusen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Austin v. Taylor et al
as 1:2008cv00204
Plaintiff:
Charles Austin
Defendant:
Stanley W. Taylor, Jr., Carl C. Danberg, Raphael Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutt et al v. Taylor et al
as 1:2008cv00184
Plaintiff:
J. Anthony Hutt, J. Anthony Hutt, Theodore T. Marek and others
Defendant:
Stanley W Taylor, Jr, Carl C. Danberg, Raphael Williams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Biggins v. Minner et al
as 1:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Minner, Carl C. Danberg, Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carter v. Taylor et al
as 1:2007cv00517
Plaintiff:
Daryl J. Carter
Defendant:
Stanley W. Taylor, Raphael Williams, Sitta B. Gombeh-Alie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rush v. Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00514
Plaintiff:
David R. Rush
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc., Scot Altman, Christine Malaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Ivens, et al
as 1:2001cv00559
Plaintiff:
George A. Jackson
Defendant:
Stanley Taylor , State of Delaware , Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
