Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Lawson, Avion v. Bryner et al
as 2:2024cv14062
Plaintiff:
Avion Lawson
Defendant:
Robert Bryner, John Holtz, Robert Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
GARY JOHNSON
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC and LEON COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Armour Correctional Services
as 5:2019cv00268
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Edwards
Defendant:
Armour Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Armour Correctional Services
as 1:2019cv21655
Defendant:
Armour Correctional Services
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons et al v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2019cv21013
Defendant:
Miami-Dade Commissary Unit, Global Tel-Link (GTL), Jackson Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Hemer Croskey, Joseph Simmons and Jose Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herr v. Volusia County, et al
as 6:2019cv00394
Plaintiff:
Joyce Herr
Defendant:
Armor Health Correctional Services Inc., Volusia County and Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
as 8:2019cv00468
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary v. Aramark Correctional Services
as 8:2017mc00116
Plaintiff:
Carlton Edward Gary
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00208
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary v. Aramark Correctional Services
as 8:2017cv01619
Plaintiff:
Carlton Gary
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
