Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Troy Brown v. City of Camden, et al
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
TROY A. BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN and COUNTY OF CAMDEN
Jamor Demby v. County of Camden
as 23-3039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
SCOTT v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2023cv20656
Plaintiff:
JAYSON SCOTT
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF CAMDEN and others
Cross Claimant:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cross Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC and JAMES R. VARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEMBY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN
as 1:2023cv02042
Plaintiff:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamor Demby v. City of Camden, et al
as 22-2941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CAMDEN and COUNTY OF CAMDEN
ROMAN v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2022cv05940
Plaintiff:
JOSE C. ROMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN and COUNTY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CAMDEN et al
as 1:2022cv05939
Plaintiff:
TROY A. BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN and COUNTY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEMBY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2020cv13892
Defendant:
EDWARD T. MCDONNELL, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUINONES v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2017cv13769
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. QUINONES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS, CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2017cv10921
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL CAMPBELL
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
