Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ahenakew v. State of Montana, et al.
as 26-3384
Plaintiff:
JORDAN AHENAKEW
Defendant:
STATE OF MONTANA, COUNTY OF CASCADE, GREAT FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT, High Risk Department and others
Ellis v. Torres et al
as 4:2026cv00009
Plaintiff:
April Ellis
Defendant:
Officer Frank Torres, Sergeant Thomas Lynch, Neil Anthon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ahenakew v. State of Montana, et al.
as 25-8097
Plaintiff:
JORDAN AHENAKEW
Defendant:
STATE OF MONTANA, COUNTY OF CASCADE, GREAT FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT, High Risk Department and others
Azure v. County of Cascade et al
as 4:2025cv00034
Plaintiff:
Brian James Azure
Defendant:
County of Cascade, Cascade County Sheriff's Office and Great Falls Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polejewski v. County of Cascade, et al.
as 25-1575
Plaintiff:
PAMELA JO POLEJEWSKI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CASCADE, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
County of Cascade v. Purdue Pharma et al
as 1:2018op45033
Plaintiff:
County of Cascade
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, The Purdue Frederick Company, Cephalon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County of Cascade v. Purdue Pharma et al
as MT/4:17-cv-00130
Plaintiff:
County of Cascade
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma , The Purdue Frederick Company , Cephalon and others
County of Cascade v. Purdue Pharma et al
as 4:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
County of Cascade
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, The Purdue Frederick Company, Cephalon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DaSilva v. County of Cascade et al
as 4:2012cv00007
Plaintiff:
Robert A DaSilva, Jr.
Defendant:
County of Cascade, City of Great Falls and Great Falls Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trudeau v. I.W.F. Council et al
as 4:2007cv00007
Plaintiff:
Clifford Trudeau
Defendant:
Aramark, County of Cascade, Mike Corrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
