Cases 1 - 10 of 300
Crabb v. Jumper
as 4:2024cv04051
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, John Doe, David Suire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabb v. Lin
as 4:2024cv04088
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Michael Lin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabb v. Kulhan et al
as 4:2024cv04081
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Gary Kulhan, Carly Rhoades and Daniel Teel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabb v. Bozdech
as 4:2024cv04072
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
John Bozdech
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Crabb v. Wexford Healthcare Services, et al
as 24-1624
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. CRABB
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and GREG DONATHAN
Crabb v. Hogan
as 4:2024cv04071
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Heather Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry et al v. Newaygo, County of, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
William Barry, Mark Booher, Tom Burkholder and others
Defendant:
Heemstra Enterprises, LLC, Newaygo, County of, Jason O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
CRABB et al v. INGRAM et al
as 9:2023cv81212
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN CRABB and ROBERT CRABB
Defendant:
JONATHAN INGRAM, ASSOCIATES OF BOCA RATON, INC. doing business as RE/MAX ADVANTAGE PLUS and ASSOCIATES OF BOCA RATON, INC. a Florida corporation doing business as RE/MAX ADVANTAGE PLUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Crabb v. Wexford Healthcare Services
as 4:2023cv04134
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Wexford Healthcare Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRABB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11141
Plaintiff:
WILLARD JAMES CRABB
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
