Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Sparks v. Hutchinson et al
as 2:2016cv10752
Plaintiff:
Andy Sparks, Jr.
Defendant:
Craig Hutchinson and Subrina Aiken
Stevens #155008 v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2013cv00918
Plaintiff:
James M. Stevens #155008
Defendant:
Craig Hutchinson, Corizon, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerry VanDiver v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 12-2329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY VANDIVER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., CRAIG HUTCHINSON, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Kensu v. Rapelje et al
as 2:2012cv13379
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Lloyd Rapelje, Jeffrey C. Stieve, MD, Craig Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Rapelje et al
as 2:2012cv11877
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Lloyd Rapelje Warden, Jeffrey C. Stieve, MD, Craig Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tullos #137990 v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Douglas F. Tullos #137990
Defendant:
Craig Hutchinson, Jeffery Stieve and Ray Ingraham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez #452721 v. Stevie et al
as 2:2011cv00515
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez #452721, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Stevie, Prison Health Services, Inc., Lawrence Pomeroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Stovall et al
as 2:2011cv14895
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Grant
Defendant:
Clarice Stovall, Millicent Warren, Jeffrey C. Stieve, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heather Robinson v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 11-2092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEATHER ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, GEORGE PRAMSTALLER, SUSAN DAVIS, Warden and others
Gresham #272603 et al v. Canlis et al
as 2:2011cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603 and Ralph Dennis #238930
Defendant:
B. Canlis, Margaret Comfort, Gloria Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
