Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cummings v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Christopher Symons, C.O. Luke Erdman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
CROSBY v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE et al
as 2:2022cv00423
Petitioner:
KEVIN TAROD CROSBY
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF INDIANA COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Foulds et al
as 1:2021cv00138
Defendant:
Lisa Rovelli, Renee Foulds, Jen Pizzoli and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosby v. Jordan et al
as 3:2016cv02456
Petitioner:
Gregory D Crosby
Respondent:
A. Jordan and David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crosby v. Chamber
as 3:2016cv01861
Petitioner:
Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
Brent Chamber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COVERT v. FREEMAN et al
as 1:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
JOHN COVERT
Defendant:
FREEMAN, BYERS, CROSBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUCCI v. TOWNSHIP OF UPPER DARBY et al
as 2:2014cv05215
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI MUCCI
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF UPPER DARBY, MICHAEL TAYLOR, STEPHEN ORSKOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. PHILA. POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2013cv06179
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CROSBY
Defendant:
PHILA. POLICE DEPARTMENT, STRIKE FORCE, PHILA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSBY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2013cv00166
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GLENN CROSBY
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BICKEL, SCI HUNTINGDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOTY v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DOTY
Defendant:
BARRY SNYDER, DOMINIC DILULLO, DAVID SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
