Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Crown Equipment Corporation v. Naumann/Hobbs Material Handling Corporation II, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Defendant:
Naumann/Hobbs Material Handling Corporation II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Barbour v. Crown Equipment Corporation
as 3:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
John Barbour
Defendant:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Lowe v. ShieldMark, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00748
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Lowe and InSite Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
ShieldMark, Inc., Advanced Plastics, Inc. and Crown Equipment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Crown Equipment Corporation v. KeHE Distributors, LLC
as 3:2017cv01711
Plaintiff:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Defendant:
KeHE Distributors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crown Equipment Corporation v. Virginia Forklift, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00296
Plaintiff:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Defendant:
Virginia Forklift, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Crown Equipment Corporation v. United States Patent and Trademark Office
as 3:2012cv03075
Plaintiff:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crown Equipment Corporation v. I.D. Systems, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00452
Plaintiff:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Defendant:
I.D. Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Connors v. Crown Equipment Corporation
as 3:2009cv01831
Plaintiff:
Paul T. Connors, Sr.
Defendant:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
