Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Biton et al v. Verilli et al
as 1:2017mc00804
Defendant:
AG of FL, AG of MD, Port Authority NY/NJ and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Biton and Danielle Biton
Biton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv09952
Plaintiff:
Crystal Biton
Defendant:
United States of America, City of New York, State of NY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Biton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv09948
Plaintiff:
Crystal Biton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Saphyre Redford, et al v. Sybil Rappaport Trust, et al.
as 15-14888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAPHYRE REDFORD, a.k.a. Crystal Biton, a.k.a. Marcelle Biton and DANIEL BITTON, a.k.a. Danielle Bitton
Defendant - Appellee:
SYBIL RAPPAPORT TRUST, ET AL.
Biton et al v. Beraka
as 1:2015cv04229
Plaintiff:
Crystal Biton and Danielle Biton
Defendant:
George Beraka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saphyre Redford, et al v. Morgan Abrutyn, et al
as 13-3189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRYSTAL BITON, CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON and DANIELLE BITON
Defendant - Appellee:
MORGAN MELHUISH ABRUTYN
Not Party - Appellant:
KRISTY TIGRESS and ALEXIS REDFORD
Crystal Biton, et al v. United Continental Airlines, et al
as 13-3188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRYSTAL BITON, a/k/a Saphyre M.G. Redford, CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON and DANIELLE BITON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
Biton v. Lippert
as 13-2302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Crystal Biton
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Lippert, Charles Harris and Elizabeth Harris
Zachery v. Biton
as 13-2176
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Pinhas Zachery
Defendant - Appellant:
Crystal Biton
Biton v. Clinton
as 13-1210
Plaintiff:
Moore Redford
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Crystal Biton and Danielle Biton
Defendant - Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, United States of America, Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
