Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Sarracino v. CVS Albany, L.L.C.
as 7:2016cv05178
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Sarracino
Defendant:
CVS Albany, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Staten et al v. CVS Albany, L.L.C.
as 1:2016cv03571
Defendant:
CVS Albany, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
John Staten, Eduardo Arroyo and Willie Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manjural Islam v CVS Albany L.L.C.
as 1:2015cv05426
Plaintiff:
Manjurul Islam
Defendant:
CVS Albany L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Schuler v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv07420
Defendant:
CVS Albany, L.L.C., CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joan Schuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Smith et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv04328
Defendant:
CVS Albany, L.L.C., CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith and Webster Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Febus v. CVS Albany, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2013cv01064
Defendant:
CVS Albany, L.L.C., CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy and others
Plaintiff:
Annie Febus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Mallick v. CVS Albany, L.L.C.
as 1:2012cv05386
Defendant:
CVS Albany, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Pranab Mallick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ferreira v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 7:2012cv04285
Plaintiff:
Maria Ferreira
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation , CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and CVS Albany, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cruz et al v. Hook-Superx, LLC. et al
as 1:2011cv00587
Plaintiff:
Reinaldo Cruz , Benjamin Tetteyfio , Anthony Mannarino and others
Defendant:
Hook-Superx, LLC. , CVS Caremark Corporation , CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
