Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Hyams v. CVS Health Corporation
as 4:2018cv06278
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation (formerly known as CVS Caremark Corporation), CVS RX Services, Inc., CVS Pharmacy Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hyams and Regine Duhon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04796
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America et al v. Walgreen Company et al
as 2:2009cv01293
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Walgreen Company
Plaintiff:
California, Jack Chin, Delaware and others
Intervenor:
State Of California
213) 894-7819 (fax:
U.S. DOJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Finn Pette et al v. International Union of Operating Engineers
as 2:2012cv09324
Plaintiff:
Anne Brophy, James McLaughlin, John Crooks and others
Defendant:
Cornel Sneekes, Patrick L Sink, Kuba J Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv04395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Slay v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2015cv01315
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2015at00707
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and Mark A. Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Sherih Ibrahim v. CVS Rx Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06372
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Rx Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sherih Ibrahim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
