Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DAVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv07616
Unknown: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA DAVIS
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robert Hathorn v. Cynthia Davis
as 26-3566
Petitioner: ROBERT T. HATHORN
Respondent: WARDEN CYNTHIA DAVIS
Robert Hathorn v. Cynthia Davis
as 26-3530
Petitioner: ROBERT T. HATHORN
Respondent: WARDEN CYNTHIA DAVIS
In re: David Huffman
as 26-3409
Petitioner: In re: DAVID WARREN HUFFMAN
Respondent: WARDEN CYNTHIA DAVIS
In re: Lamar Reese
as 26-3408
Petitioner: In re: LAMAR REESE
Respondent: CYNTHIA DAVIS, Warden
Davis v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv04687
Plaintiff: Cynthia Davis
Defendant: Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Luster Products, Inc. and Strength of Nature, LLC
: Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nashe v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2026cv00280
Petitioner: Dennis Nashe
Respondent: Warden Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennett et al v. Homesite Insurance Company
as 3:2026cv00081
Plaintiff: Brian Jennett and Cynthia Davis
Defendant: Homesite Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Harris v. Davis
as 1:2026cv00080
Petitioner: Kelonte Harris and Kielonte Harris
Respondent: Warden Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv00029
Plaintiff: Maurice Johnson
Defendant: Warden Cynthia Davis, Annette Smith-Chambers, Rachael Herr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?