Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Sherman v. Williams, et al
as 1:2026cv00861
Plaintiff: shyla sherman
Defendant: brittany williams, jason taylor, Warden Cynthia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Davis et al
as 1:2026cv00758
Plaintiff: Kandale L. Harrison
Defendant: Cynthia Davis, Gaary Galloway, Jeremy Oppy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv07616
Unknown: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA DAVIS
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robert Hathorn v. Cynthia Davis
as 26-3566
Petitioner: ROBERT T. HATHORN
Respondent: WARDEN CYNTHIA DAVIS
Robert Hathorn v. Cynthia Davis
as 26-3530
Petitioner: ROBERT T. HATHORN
Respondent: WARDEN CYNTHIA DAVIS
Goins v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 1:2026cv00550
Plaintiff: Justin Goins
Defendant: Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, Officer Rollins, Officer Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: David Huffman
as 26-3409
Petitioner: In re: DAVID WARREN HUFFMAN
Respondent: WARDEN CYNTHIA DAVIS
In re: Lamar Reese
as 26-3408
Petitioner: In re: LAMAR REESE
Respondent: CYNTHIA DAVIS, Warden
Davis v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv04687
Plaintiff: Cynthia Davis
Defendant: Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Luster Products, Inc. and Strength of Nature, LLC
: Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nashe v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2026cv00280
Petitioner: Dennis Nashe
Respondent: Warden Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?