Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01707
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Estape et al
as 1:2026cv24144
Plaintiff:
Jovonie Jackson
Defendant:
Zachary Estape, Tatiana Cadet, Eduardo Rodrieguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. Office of Personnel Management, et al
as 26-1556
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN, LANESE NORMIL, MICHAELLE DESROSIERS CADET and others
Defendant:
US OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, OPM, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF STATES and others
Clervrain v. Griffin, et al
as 26-1534
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN, ASHLY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE, FRIDELYNE MAISONEUVE and others
Defendant:
ANTWAUN GRIFFIN, ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN, DIEDRA HENRY-SPIRES and others
Kurtz-Miller et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03990
Plaintiff:
Mary Kurtz-Miller, Michael Gartrell, Janae Ling Cadet and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sorenson et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04017
Plaintiff:
Scott Sorenson, Christina Martin, Latoria Cadet and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CADET v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv03440
Plaintiff:
MARTHA CADET
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WILSON et al v. J BAR C PROVISIONERS LLC et al
as 2:2026cv02897
Plaintiff:
TREYVON WILSON and SAHADIA CADET
Defendant:
J BAR C PROVISIONERS LLC and JONATHAN BATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cadet v. Cadet
as 3:2026cv00310
Plaintiff:
FRANTZ CADET, Jr.
Defendant:
Lily cadet
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
v. CADET, Jr.
as 3:2026cv00308
Defendant:
FRANTZ CADET, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
