Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Caffey v. Luster Products Company et al
as 1:2023cv15151
Plaintiff:
Carla Caffey
Defendant:
Luster Products Company, Loreal USA Inc, Loreal USA Products Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrews et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv04873
Defendant:
City of Chicago Transportation Department, United States of America, United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Devaughn Webb, Jaleah Davis, Quianna Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Caffey v. Hobbs et al
as 1:2016cv09075
Plaintiff:
Crystal Cora Caffey
Defendant:
Officer Hobbs and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caffey v. Best et al
as 3:2013cv03296
Plaintiff:
Allen Neely Caffey
Defendant:
Best, Berry, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caffey v. Best et al
as 3:2013cv00457
Plaintiff:
Allen Neely Caffey
Defendant:
Best, Berry, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caffey v. Henry et al
as 3:2013cv00322
Plaintiff:
Allen Neely Caffey
Defendant:
S Henry, Hasemeyer, Maue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caffey et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv10500
Plaintiff:
Jessica Caffey , Tammy Morrison , Abihgail Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abernathy et al v. Chicago
as 1:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
Tony Abernathy , Phillip Adams , Juan Ahedo and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caffey v. Taylor et al
as 3:2011cv50137
Plaintiff:
Walter Caffey
Defendant:
Gladyse C. Taylor, Nedra Chandler and Amber Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caffey v. Pierce
as 1:2009cv05458
Petitioner:
Fedell R. Caffey
Respondent:
Guy Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
