Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Nahant Preservation Trust, Inc.V et al v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv10486
Plaintiff:
Nahant Preservation Trust, Inc., Christian Bauta, Tess Bauta and others
Defendant:
Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company and United States Liability Insurance Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
O'Hara v. Cahill
as 1:2021cv11271
Plaintiff:
Maureen O'Hara
Defendant:
Mary E. Cahill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aswegan v. Diesel et al
as 1:2020mc91124
Defendant:
John H. Diesel and Patrick J. Cahill
Plaintiff:
Sara Aswegan
Metacarpa et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv30041
Plaintiff:
Christy Metacarpa and Robert Metacarpa
Defendant:
United States of America, Soldier On, Inc., Kevin Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shannon v. Cahill
as 4:2018cv40154
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Shannon
Defendant:
Patricia S. Cahill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2017cv40103
Plaintiff:
Carl S. Johnson
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Carl Supernor, Terrence Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Rivera v. Worcester et al
as 4:2017cv40029
Plaintiff:
Juan R. Rivera
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Terrence Cahill , Carl Supernor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holloway v. Town of Plymouth et al
as 4:2017cv40028
Plaintiff:
Dale E. Holloway, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Plymouth, Plymouth Police Commissioner, Thomas Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbons et al v. Titan Fire Protection, Inc.
as 1:2014cv11795
Plaintiff:
Peter Gibbons , C.J. Cahill , Sprinkler Fitters Local 550 Annuity Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Titan Fire Protection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
